Last week’s bombshell hearing to determine whether to remove Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from prosecuting the sweeping RICO case against Donald Trump for allegedly plotting to illegally overturn the 2020 election in Georgia concluded with one main question: When will the judge render his decision?

Here’s what we know

While it appears that Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee’s looming decision could come any day, it likely won’t be handed down before both sides – prosecutors from Willis’ office and defense attorneys representing Trump’s interests – present their closing arguments and statements stemming from a complaint from one of Trump’s co-defendants about an alleged conflict of interest that Willis benefited financially from a former romantic relationship with a special prosecutor in the RICO case.

And with a full week having elapsed between when McAfee adjourned the case on Feb. 16, it’s unclear when the case will resume.

The complaint, which was filed in court last month by former Trump campaign official Michael Roman — who is accused of using fake electors to prevent Joe Biden’s presidential election from being certified — includes an accusation that Willis paid Nathan Wade more than $650,000 in taxpayer money to be a special prosecutor in the case despite him lacking the “relevant experience” needed to prosecute a high-profile RICO case like this one.

Wade and Willis previously confirmed their past romantic relationship before going into detail last week during the hearing.

Roman’s complaint alleges that all of the above gives Willis a conflict of interest in the case and seeks not only her removal but also Wade’s. If that were to happen, it could threaten the overall RICO case from moving forward and hand a significant legal victory to Trump as he mounts a presidential campaign while navigating between multiple other court cases related to allegations he tried to overturn the 2020 election.

Defense attorneys at the hearing tried to establish that Wade used the money he earned from the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office to take Willis on vacations like a tropical cruise and flights to places like Miami and California.

But Willis shattered that notion by claiming she always paid back Wade. Those payments, she said, were always in cash, claims that defense attorneys in search of receipts scrutinized. A host at a winery in Napa Valley where Willis and Wade traveled together said this week that he remembered Willis paying in cash, effectively further corroborating her claims.

“I don’t need anything from a man — a man is not a plan. A man is a companion,” Willis testified last week. “And so there was tension always in our relationship, which is why I would give him his money back.”

Recounting racist treatment when he said an establishment refused his credit cards as payment, Willis’ father also testified in the hearing last week that he has always counseled his daughter to keep large amounts of cash wherever she is.

What the experts are saying

The hearing last week was effectively a game of smoke and mirrors as Trump World looks to deflect responsibility for what became a full-blown insurrection by showcasing salacious details of a personal relationship that has no bearing on the actual charges facing the former president and his co-defendants.

In that respect, the two-day hearing last week was simply a side show, according to MSNBC columnist Katie S. Phang.

“It’s worth repeating that the law in Georgia requires that an actual conflict of interest exist for disqualification of a prosecuting attorney. The conflict cannot be theoretical or speculative,” Phang wrote this week. “Appellate courts in Georgia recognize specific reasons to disqualify a prosecutor, none of which is applicable to Willis.”

However, citing federal court guidelines, Fulton County criminal defense lawyer Andrew Fleischman said in an op-ed for the Hill that “there is an obvious appearance of impropriety” because “federal prosecutors are not allowed to participate in cases where someone with whom they have a close personal relationship has a substantial financial interest. In other words, they can’t hire a spouse or boyfriend to be a special prosecutor.”

Of course, Willis is not a federal prosecutor and Fulton County Superior Court is not a federal court.

Attacks on Fani Willis must be taking a toll

Jennifer R. Farmer, an author and the founder of Spotlight PR LLC, has expressed concern for Willis’ well-being considering the barrage of attacks she’s endured since announcing her office’s prosecution of Trump.

“There will be people who review DA Willis’ testimony and praise her, but I am clear that this experience (of investigating former President Trump and then being publicly questioned about her personal and romantic relationship with Mr. Wade) must have an adverse impact on her,” Farmer wrote this week in an op-ed for NewsOne.

SEE ALSO:

Kelly Loeffler Of KKK Selfie Fame Whitesplains Fani Willis, Nathan Wade Relationship In Trump-Loving Op-Ed

Mike Roman, Trump Co-Defendant Behind Fani Willis Complaint, Struggling To Raise Money For Legal Fees

The post When Will Judge Rule Whether Fani Willis Is Disqualified From Trump RICO Case? appeared first on NewsOne.